The Magus · Quest for The Is–Ought Problem
Bridging the Gap
The Prompt
Attempt to construct a valid argument whose premises are purely descriptive (containing no normative terms) and whose conclusion is genuinely normative. If you succeed, defend your argument against the charge that a hidden normative premise lurks within. If you conclude the bridge cannot be built, explain precisely why — drawing on Hume, Moore, and Putnam — and consider what this failure means for moral reasoning in practice.
Completion Criteria
Either a carefully constructed argument attempting the is-ought bridge with a defense against the hidden-premise objection, or a rigorous explanation of why the bridge fails, engaging with at least three thinkers from the tradition.
Claim this quest
Students who have attested
No Students have attested this quest yet. Be the first.